Pages
(Move to ...)
Home
About Us
GN On-the-Go!
US Army Acronyms
Doctrine and Operations
Designing Out Loud
COIN Wargaming
Games Bibliography
DICE!
▼
Showing posts with label
Acquisitions
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
Acquisitions
.
Show all posts
16 October 2013
The UCP is Dead - Long Live the UCP!
›
How bad was the UCP? Despite knowing it was crap. the Army spent $5 billion to replace the old BDU , and is now spending billions more to ...
1 comment:
16 April 2013
Secretary of the Navy Announces the Names of Multiple New Ships
›
The DoD is announcing the Navy's plans for the naming of a group of new ships . Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus announced today the n...
16 October 2012
Fractures in Army's Training Sims Community
›
In what can only be described as shot across the bow to any Army agency not called "TCM-Gaming" the new new TRADOC command policy ...
8 comments:
21 September 2012
Palantir and the Acquisitions System
›
Did 3MECH try to sneak their way around the system ? The issue that alarmed Shyu was that the unit said it couldn’t pay for the system, an...
15 September 2012
US Navy to Christen Second Joint High Speed Vessel
›
The US Navy is going to launch the USS Choctaw County . The Navy will christen the Joint High Speed Vessel (JHSV) Choctaw County, named fo...
24 July 2012
What Comes After VBS-2?
›
The Army sure would like to know . The U.S. Army is in the market for a next-generation first-person-shooter (FPS) training game that will...
23 July 2012
Army Defense of Pricey Acquisitions At the Expense of Performance
›
Army acquisitions trying to defend their own investments? The Army ordered the destruction of a report that praised the performance of an ...
21 July 2012
Empty Promises on Canadian Defense Investments?
›
The Economist has a bleak outlook on plans vs reality in Canadian defense spending . One of the main ways Stephen Harper, Canada’s Conserv...
13 July 2012
GD Up To Their Roadwheels in Deep Doo-Doo
›
There's an IG report on General Dynamics "wasting" a metric assload of money on the Stryker program, and apparently never tri...
01 July 2012
DoD Shifting Dollars Around - What're They For?
›
Every year, starting FYQ4 the DoD asks Congress to shift money around in their accounts. This year's "big shift" is to cover ...
"Low Overhead" Sims for Army Training?
›
It's nice that FOGN Michael Peck thinks that the Army is migrating toward lower-cost alternatives, but the truth is that it'll neve...
30 June 2012
COA Analysis: Budgets Spiraling Out Of Control
›
As fiscal crises deepen - just because an economy recovers doesn't mean future budgetary commitments evaporate - what do you expect to s...
16 June 2012
DoD is (sing it, Daltrey!) "Going Mo-BILE!"
›
The DoD has released their new mobile device "strategy" . The Department of Defense announced today the release of a mobile devi...
13 June 2012
Drones To Keep Watch Over Canadian Arctic?
›
This might be one way for Ottawa to justify purchasing a reduced number of F-35 stealth fighters. The federal government [of Canada] is co...
2 comments:
02 June 2012
Navy Secretary to Commission Submarine Mississippi Today
›
The Secretary of the Navy will commission the submarine USS Mississippi . The Navy’s newest Virginia-class attack submarine Mississippi wi...
31 May 2012
Army's New Ground Combat Vehicle Contract. Yes, Again.
›
Some excellent background on how we got where we are today . The GCV Infantry Fighting Vehicle is not a simple competition among existing ...
1 comment:
26 May 2012
COTS Networking Gets Military Workout
›
The Economist takes a quick trip to Ft Bliss to look into the current NIE . It has been three weeks since the Ellisian army invaded next-d...
05 May 2012
Navy to Christen USNS Cesar Chavez
›
We won't editorials on Cesar Chavez, and instead just point out that the US Navy will christen the USNS Cesar Chavez on Saturday evenin...
01 May 2012
Sound Off! Specialized Platforms or One-Size-Fits-All
›
Do you build your vehicle fleet on... ... distinct platforms for each system (AFV, tank, arty, etc)? ... a common platform that does man...
1 comment:
25 April 2012
Congress Authorizing Continued M1 Abrams Purchases, Despite Army Needs
›
The Army says they don't need them. Congress doesn't care, and is continuing to fund purchases of M1 Abrams tanks beyond what the ...
›
Home
View web version