19 June 2012

Sound Off! Portability

Should the US Army focus on...

Long-duration deployments, rotations, occupations, and combat, taking time to build a robust in-theater force for battlefield dominance?

Lightweight, portable, fast-response in-theater forces with austere footprints that can get in and get out quickly?

Justify your decision below!

By: Brant

1 comment:

Brian said...

The latter (i.e. "in-and-out"), in the belief that it will be cheaper, scaleable, and less tangled politically. And justified for that reason, don't ask me if the approach would be more effective militarily.