02 March 2010

Playing Politics with Stationing and Deployments Again

'Cuz, hey - it's not about what's best for the defense of our nation, it's about how many jobs Tidewater, VA will lose if they base an aircraft carrier in Mayport, FL.

Hampton Roads officials acknowledged Monday they have to walk a fine line in pressing the Navy about its decision to move an aircraft carrier from Norfolk to Mayport, Fla.

They want to ask tough questions without alienating defense leaders, mindful that more miliary debates are always down the road.

That was one observation from a special military advisory commission created by Rep. Glenn Nye, D-Norfolk, that includes elected officials and retired admirals

One risk in pressing to keep all carriers in Norfolk is "fighting for it in a way that alienates our friends in the Navy," said Newport News Mayor Joe Frank, a commission member.

"We're trying to back them off a decision they've already made," added retired Vice Adm. Joe Donnell. He said Hampton Roads leaders must be careful not to ask "antagonistic questions."

Nye said Hampton Roads officials can avoid that if they seek details in the name of transparency and cost efficiency.

"We feel the Navy hasn't made the case for investing a billion dollars in another home port," he said.

The Defense Department recently called for moving one carrier from Naval Station Norfolk to Mayport, and now Congress must decide about funding. Spreading out the fleet reduces the risk from a single attack, natural disaster or accident, defense leaders say. However, Virginia leaders say the cost does not justify the benefit.


Gee, would you expect Hampton Roads to ever admit that the Navy might have a good case? How about getting the entire East Coast carrier fleet out of detonation range of each other? Y'think maybe that's a good idea?

By: Brant

No comments: