11 March 2010

Tools of War: Stryker ACV





Okay, I'll be honest right here at the beginning: I was wrong.

To my friends, you know you don't hear that very often (not because I won't admit when I'm wrong, but because I rarely AM wrong ;-).

As I've mentioned before, I'm an ex-tanker, and back in the day when they first announced the Stryker, I thought that some folks up on high were out of their collective minds. Turns out, they got it exactly right. The Stryker is EXACTLY what we needed to add to our TO&E, and the Bradley and Abrams were not the end-all, be-all armored vehicle combo for every situation.

Not to demean the M1- and M2-families of vehicles. The Abrams is arguably the premier tank of the world, and the Bradley is an extremely capable vehicle as well. Both proved their worth beyond a shadow of a doubt in ODS 1 and 2. Simply put, they slaughtered the enemy. Perhaps this is what colored my thinking when I expressed disbelief that the Army was introducing a wheeled armored vehicle.

Said upper-echelon brain trust had the foresight to see the flavor of future conflicts would revolve heavily around COIN and similar environments. They also saw that we did not have a family of vehicles optimized for that environment. Enter the Stryker. Perfect? No (plans are in place to go to a more V-shaped, MRAP-style hull, and it is still too heavy to be airlifted by helicopter). But pretty damn good, nonetheless...

Two interesting features that I really like:
  • The vehicle has training software built into the vehicle, so every team can simultaneously train, and train IN THE ACTUAL VEHICLE. No more waiting to go into a mock-up trainer that only approximates the system...it's the actual vehicle. The training value of this can not be over-stated.
  • The digital networking capability is integrated into the vehicle from the get-go, and is not an add-on package. The ability for EACH VEHICLE to see a clear picture of where they are in relation to other friendly vehicles as well as to known enemy positions, as well as enabling FRAGO's on the fly, is a major combat multiplier.

Relatively light (critical in under-developed areas) and agile, the Stryker can go most anywhere, and it is versatile enough to be configured for a myriad of applications.

The Stryker has the following configurations, with more planned (thanks wiki!):

My Dad always told me to use the right tool for the job. In today's combat environment, the Stryker is exactly that.

And back by popular demand, that annoying, whispering ex-SEAL:



By: Steve

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Yeah, about the stryker, it needs a LOT of work. Although the US produces fine military vehicles, the stryker is not one of them. It is too lightly armored, too heavy, and is not amphibious. The original MOWAG and the LAV were far superior.